Redefining U.S. Governance: Executive Authority, Democratic Challenges, and Global Consequences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14576459Keywords:
Neo-nationalism, U.S. Governance, U.S. Sovereignty, Democratic Accountability, Conservative PolicyAbstract
This study critically examines the potential impacts of a conservative policy blueprint on U.S. governance and democratic institutions. Through qualitative content analysis, it delves into key themes such as the consolidation of executive authority, federal agency reforms, and shifts in governance processes. The research highlights the broader neo-nationalist agenda, emphasizing U.S. sovereignty, protectionist economic policies, and a more assertive stance in foreign relations, particularly concerning China. While the policy blueprint promotes government efficiency and national security, it raises significant concerns about democratic accountability, global instability, and the weakening of checks and balances within the U.S. political system. By concentrating power within the executive branch and diminishing the role of federal agencies and civil service, the blueprint poses risks of politicizing public institutions. Furthermore, its focus on economic independence and protectionism could strain U.S.-China relations, potentially destabilizing global trade networks. This study contributes to the ongoing debate on governance reform, assessing both the potential benefits and risks of this vision for the future of U.S. leadership and its influence on international relations and democratic processes.
References
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). (2024). Project 2025 Explained. ACLU. https://www.aclu.org
Davidescu, A. A., Nae, T. M., & Florescu, M. S. (2024). From policy to impact: Advancing economic development and tackling social inequities in central and eastern Europe. Economies, 12(2), 28. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/economies12020028
FactCheck.org. (2024). Project 2025 Overview. https://www.factcheck.org.
Global Trends in Government Innovation 2023 (2024). OECD Report. https://oecd-opsi.org/publications/trends-2023/
Gur, N., & Dilek, S. (2023). US–China economic rivalry and the reshoring of global supply chains. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 16(1), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poac022
Heritage Foundation (2023). Project 2025 mandate for leadership. The Heritage Foundation.
Heritage Foundation (2024). Mission. https://www.heritage.org/about-heritage/mission
Higham, I. (2024). Conditionalities in international organization accession processes: Spreading business and human rights norms in central and Eastern Europe? Business and Human Rights Journal, 9(1), 54-76. https://10.1017/bhj.2023.19
Kaufman, R. R., Kelemen, R. D., & Kolcak, B. (2024). Federalism and Democratic Backsliding in Comparative Perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592724000604
Luo, Y. (2024). Paradigm shift and theoretical implications for the era of global disorder. Journal of International Business Studies, 55(2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-023-00659-2
McDonald, L. (2014). Think tanks and the media: How the conservative movement gained entry into the education policy arena. Educational policy, 28(6), 845-880. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048134923
Nichols, J. (2024, June 4). Project 2025’s guide to subverting democracy. The Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/society/project-2025-democracy-fcc-fec/
Roberts, K. (2023). Heritage foundation’s mandate for leadership and neo-nationalism. Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org
Sirayon, H. (2024). Frontiers of power struggle between incumbent US and an ascending China and its implications on global peace and stability. Journal of Diplomacy, Peace and Conflict Studies, 1(1), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.17613/fwv7-m222
The New Republic (2024). Why Project 2025 Should Haunt U.S. Politics. https://www.newrepublic.com
Willett, D. (2023). League of conservation voters analysis of Project 2025. LCV. https://www.lcv.org.
Williams, K. (2023). Project 2025: A blueprint for conservative governance. The Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org
Zahoor, N., Wu, J., Khan, H., & Khan, Z. (2023). De-globalization, international trade protectionism, and the reconfigurations of global value chains. Management International Review, 63(5), 823-859.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-023-00522-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Social and Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.







