A structural equation analysis of employee work assessment tool for pharmaceutical marketing executives
Keywords:
Factorial invariance, working tools, behavioral research, managementAbstract
Globally, human capital management is an ongoing challenge for human resource managers. The identification and provision of essential work resources addressing both direct work and implied needs of employees is a continuous subject of interest in the management sciences. Therefore, the use of reliable, valid, and precise research instruments capable of assessing employee perceptions across various subgroups is of prime importance. Hence, the need to validate an instrument that satisfies the pre-conditions of factorial invariance is required. The purpose of the study was to determine the construct and invariance validity of a developed psychometric instrument across subgroups of pharmaceutical representatives in Nigeria. A cross-sectional, self-reported quantitative study that used an employee work assessment questionnaire administered to sales professionals (N=369) operating in Nigeria using random sampling. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling in AMOS, was used to develop model and test hypotheses. The mean weighted average method (MWA) was used to score the relative importance of indicators in the model. The measurement model satisfied model fit and reliability specifications. The invariance test parameters were adequate and invariant across gender, profession, and experience levels. Configural and metric invariance were obtained for the type of pharmaceutical company, with violations of scalar and metric invariance. The provision of work tools and adequate resources had the highest importance (MWA=3.53) followed by a need for impactful training to support work engagements (MWA=3.48). The application of the validated tool is a useful and statistically robust instrument for human resource managers to assess sales workforce perception.
References
Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). Amos (version 24) [Computer Program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS
Ahmad, N. F., Jye, A. K., Zulkifli, Z., & Bujang, M. A. (2020). The development and validation of a job satisfaction questionnaire for the health workforce. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences. 27(6): 128-143. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2020.27.6.12
Batura, N., Skordis-Worrall, J., Thapa, R., Basnyat, R., & Morrison, J. (2016). Is the job satisfaction survey a good tool to measure satisfaction amongst health workers in Nepal? Results of a validation analysis. BMC Health Services Research. 16:308. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1558-4
Belete, A. K. (2018). Turnover Intention Influencing Factors of Employees; An Empirical Work Review. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Organization Management. 7;3. Doi. 10. 4172/2169-026X.1000253
Bryne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS Graphics: a road less traveled. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal. 11(2): 272-301. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1102_8.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group
Chakrabartty, S. N. (2014). Scoring and analysis of Likert scale: few approaches. Journal of Knowledge Management and Information Technology. 1(2):31-44
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling. 9(2): 233-255
French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. (2008). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis: locating the invariant referent sets. Structural Equation Modeling. 15(1): 96-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701758349
Hair J. F, Black W. C, Babin B.J., & Anderson R. E (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson: Upper Saddle River, NJ
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing. 43(1): 115-135
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial squares. International Marketing Review. 33(3): 405-431
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 6:1-55. https://doi.prg/10.1080/10705519909540118
Inayat, W., & Khan, M. J. (2021). A study of job satisfaction and the effect on the performance of employees working in private sector organizations, Peshawar. Article ID: 1251495:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1751495
Khaled, B. M., Kimmel, L., & Trung, K. L (2018). Assessing the factor structure and measurement invariance of the eating attitude test (EAT-26) across language and BMI in young Arabian women. Journal of Eating Disorders. 6:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-018-0199-x.
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th Edn. New York, NY: Guilford Press
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal. 28(1):227-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
Maan, A. T., Abid, G., Butt, T. H., Ashfaq, F., & Ahmed, S., (2020). Perceived organizational support and Job satisfaction; a moderated mediation model of proactive personality and psychological empowerment. Future Business Journal. 6;21
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods. 4: 84-99
Malhotra, N. K., & Dash, S. (2011). Marketing Research an Applied Orientation. London: Pearson Publishing.
Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right; Do's, Don'ts, and How-tos. International Journal of Psychological Research. 3(1); 97-110.
McKinsey (2017). Winning in Nigeria: Pharma's next frontier. McKinsey & Company, May 2017. [mckinsey.com] [Accessed January 2022]
Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research. 3:111-121
Mundongo, T. H., Ditend, Y. G., VanGillie, D., & Malonga, K. F. (2014). The assessment of job satisfaction for the health providers in university clinics of Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo. Pan African Medical Journal. 19:265. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.19.269.3138
National Bureau of Statistics. (2020) 2017 Demographic Statistics Bulletin. Published May 2018. http;//nigerianstat.gov.ng. (Accessed April 2021)
Oamen, T. E. (2021). Analysis of factors influencing pharmaceutical sales workforce engagement in pharmaceutical marketing in Nigeria: a structural equation modeling approach. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 27(4):405-410
Oamen, T. E., & Omorenuwa, S. O. (2021). The nexus of perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, and job motivation on turnover Intentions of pharmaceutical sales executives using structural equation modeling. Global Journal of Management and Business Research. 21(9):
Parvin, M. M., & Kabir, M. M. (2011). Factors affecting employee job satisfaction in the pharmaceutical sector. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research. 1(9): 113-123.
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance convention and reporting: the state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Development Review. 41:71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
Schumacker RE & Lomax R. G (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York; NY: Routledge Academic
Sittisom, W. (2020). Factors affecting job satisfaction of employees in the pharmaceutical industry: a case study of Thailand. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. 11(3):125-133. https://doi.org/10.5530/srp.2020.3.14
Wang, T. K., & Brower, R. (2019). Job satisfaction among federal employees: the role of employee interaction with the work environment. Public Personnel Management. 48(1): 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026018782999
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Social and Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.








